The story
Several reviewers from different AI model families read the system in parallel, and none of them may change anything. One works as an attacker. Their findings are merged, ranked by severity and handed over with the file and line for each.
The crew
The specialists behind this role, grouped by the kind of work they do.
Challenges decisions
- Red Team ReviewerAttacks every major decision and every change of scope from a different model family than the builders, looking for the assumption that breaks, and holds approval until it has answered.Also serves The Advisory Board, The Software Department
- Issue Review PanelIt assigns AI advisors distinct roles (mediator, technical expert, security auditor, devil's advocate, referee, pragmatist and innovator), has them review an issue together, and follows the issue for changes.Also serves The Incident Commander
- Code-Grounded ReviewerReviews a team's claims about finished work with search access limited to that system's code, so every finding points to a file and line.Also serves The Review Panel
- Independent Review ClerkIt matches the verdict to the review that was requested and releases or holds the project exactly once.Also serves The Change Board
Audits and guards
- Security Attack TesterThrows command injection, path traversal, header injection, forbidden schemes, forged identities and runaway tool chains at every tool and fails the build if any attack gets through.Also serves The Security Officer
- Dead Code FinderLists functions and types that nothing appears to call, as candidates for a person to review.Also serves The Due-Diligence Analyst
- Independent Code AuditorAudits a running system read-only in parallel tracks (interfaces, storage, runtime and deployment, test honesty) and reports every finding with file, line and severity against what the documentation claims.Also serves The Due-Diligence Analyst
Where this crew also works
Routes
Routes this role works in. Its place in each one is filled in.