- 1authoritative context fabric
- 6kinds of source in that context
- 4scope levels a participant is filtered by
- 0AI providers that own the truth
Methods and Systems for Maintaining Unified Conversation Context Across Heterogeneous Reasoning Backends Using a Provider-Neutral Substrate and a Transcript Authority Decoupled From a Scoped Semantic Store. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 64/147,766 (patent pending). Embodied in the collaboration shell of Helix.
One fabric instead of scattered sources
Traditional AI systems inherit fragmented context from whichever tool or provider they happen to be using: conversations in one place, files in another, email, meetings and enterprise artifacts elsewhere, with no single complete view. This invention holds context in one authoritative context fabric that no provider owns, which any of many heterogeneous models can be grounded from.
The fabric keeps the transcript authority, the semantic memory, the revisions with their watermarks and the provenance of every source, and the shared thread is authoritative independently of any provider's native session.
Context is more than conversation
Context is the union of many knowledge sources: conversations and transcripts, files and documents, email, meetings, application or enterprise artifacts, and semantic knowledge. A chat history is one part of it, never the whole.
Context filtered by scope
Each participant receives context appropriate to its operating scope, system, project, work order or conversation, rather than the entire corpus. Context is filtered by scope, so a model sees only what it is authorised to see.
Shared authority, separate native continuity
The invention separates the authoritative shared context from each backend's own session continuity. Each provider keeps its native continuity for what it is good at, and none of those sessions becomes the record.
What a provider remembers in its own session never stands in for the shared record.
Model memory is not system memory.
A grounding packet for the current moment
Each model receives a grounding packet reconstructed from the authoritative fabric at the current scope and the current revision, combined with that model's own provider-native continuity, rather than owning the full authoritative memory itself.
Revisions under a watermark
Semantic memory evolves under explicit revisions, each change applied to the previous revision to produce the next, and a watermark records which revision a packet reflects. The authoritative historical thread stays traceable.
Additive degradation
If one context source is temporarily unavailable, the system degrades additively: it grounds on the sources it has, names the one that is missing, and does not lose the thread.
Knowledge that outlives any session
Knowledge lifetime exceeds model session lifetime. Many systems contribute to one authoritative context, and many models can join, leave and resume without any one provider becoming the owner of the truth.